Addressing Clinical Faculty Need: Creating a Process and Evaluation for Peer Review of Practice

Addressing Clinical Faculty Need: Creating a Process and Evaluation for Peer Review of Practice

Blog Article

Objectives: To describe the evolving process and Artbook evaluate the perceived value of peer review for clinical faculty.Methods: Using a 5-point Likert scale, clinical faculty rated the value of an electronic peer review process by completing an electronic 30 item survey across six areas of clinical faculty practice-related activity.Based on feedback, modifications were made and faculty were re-surveyed the following year.Results: Initially, 78% of faculty found peer review to be beneficial, mostly in the area of practice development and portions of practice dissemination.After modifications, 45% found peer review to be beneficial.

Conclusions: Clinical faculty are challenged to leverage their practice into teaching and scholarly activities; however, clinical faculty often need feedback to SAMSUNG Dual Cook NV75K5571 Electric Oven - Black 60cm accomplish this.Although the peer review process was designed to address perceived needs of clinical faculty, the process is dynamic and needs further refinement.Overall, clinical faculty find value in a peer review process.This evaluation of peer review illustrates the challenges to provide feedback across six key areas of clinical faculty activity.Type: Original Research.